Killing of Piripaharan Vs. Bin Laden - Pros and cons

4 May 2011

There is still a big buzz about killing of LTTE terrorist leader Velupille Piripaharan. LTTE leader was killed against the will of Western political leadership. Some vicious elements in the West is still finding ways to revenge their political defeat. In this backdrop it has reported the killing of Osama Bil Laden. Following is an one to one comparison of both the victories of fight against terrorism.

Velupille Piripaharan	Osama Bin Laden
Leader of LTTE terrorist organization.	Leader of Al-qaida terrorist organization.
Killed in battle field at Nandikadal lagoon in Mulativu, Sri Lanka.	Killed in his private compound in civilian area in Pakistan by United States Navy SEALS in a covert operation authorized by USA President Barrack Obama.
Killed while in LTTE military uniform on day time.	Killed in civilian attire while sleeping in the mid of night.
Person was hiding and fighting in unidentified manner until the body was subsequently recognized as Piripaharan	Before attacking the place, US military and president Obama had confirmed that Osama Bin Laden was in the house with minimal security. USA military and political leadership could have easily arrested Osama instead.
Killed when he was with his gun and fighting against military forces	USA officials has claimed that Osama has not resisted with firing during the operation
Killed while alone from family in battle field	Killed when living with his family members (Family members were also killed in the battles by USA forces)

In which situation killing could have been avoided if required?

Now it is up to you to decide, if the wild west want Sri Lankan president Mahinda Rajapaksa to be punished  for killing of Piripaharan, who should be punished before him?