(Part 2 of a article by Sarojini Dutt published in DailyNews on Jan 28 , 2010.)
- Part 1 of the article
The problem however is that Rajapaksa is popular across the length and breadth of the country and his Government’s annihilation of the terrorists has made his popularity soar. As the report identifies, there is no political leader in the country to match his popularity.
Wickremesinghe, in the report, has been identified as a very close ally of the US who has consistently urged the US to take Sri Lanka to the war crimes tribunal.
As the report admits, Wickremesinghe lacks the charisma to battle Rajapaksa nation-wide. Fonseka is identified as the only individual who perhaps could challenge Rajapaksa’s popularity nationally, having been the Commander of the troops that defeated the terrorists.
Engagement of Fonseka by the US
Blake engaged Fonseka at the height of the war. He persuaded Fonseka to apply for Permanent Residency in the US which would lighten Fonseka’s financial burden of educating his children. Fortune smiled on Fonseka when out of a 6.4 million applicants, Fonseka was one of the chosen few of a mere 50,000 to be accorded permanent residency in the US.
The problem however is that Rajapaksa is popular across the length and breadth of the country and his Government’s annihilation of the terrorists has made his popularity soar. As the report identifies, there is no political leader in the country to match his popularity. Wickremesinghe, in the report, has been identified as a very close ally of the US who has consistently urged the US to take Sri Lanka to the war crimes tribunal.
As the report admits, Wickremesinghe lacks the charisma to battle Rajapaksa nation-wide. Fonseka is identified as the only individual who perhaps could challenge Rajapaksa’s popularity nationally, having been the Commander of the troops that defeated the terrorists.
Blake engaged Fonseka at the height of the war. He persuaded Fonseka to apply for Permanent Residency in the US which would lighten Fonseka’s financial burden of educating his children. Fortune smiled on Fonseka when out of a 6.4 million applicants, Fonseka was one of the chosen few of a mere 50,000 to be accorded permanent residency in the US.
Creation of the rift
Rumour Street had it, from about early 2009, that Blake had urged Fonseka, notorious for an inflated ego, to increase the strength of the Army. Fonseka complied by pressing the Government, in the aftermath of the war, to increase the strength of the Army to 300,000 (It is presumed that this is his opinion even at present).
Rumour Street also had it that the same sources leaked it to the Government that they had intelligence that Fonseka was planning a military coup.
The rift was created and the first step for a regime change had begun. In the meantime whispers to both sides, from the different mouths of the same source, continued and the rift widened.
Reportedly, it was conveyed to the Government that Fonseka, still in uniform, was harbouring Presidential ambitions and to Fonseka that he could easily be the top honcho, barring his safety; it was suggested to him that if he made an implicative confession, to his country of adoption, regarding the conduct of the war, that would serve as his life insurance; this, he was apparently assured, would be released only if some harm were to befall him.
A highly controversial trip to the US was arranged in November 2009 with Blake choreographing the moves.
The much publicized statement of Fonseka to a newspaper recently, is reportedly a transcript of a recording that was made in the US which found its way into the island in the pouch of a roving envoy, this, reportedly again, was played to a journalist who had the privilege of listening to it but not permitted to take a copy.
Through a grapevine it was leaked that the journalist does not have a copy of the recording.
One conceivable danger is that if a stone is thrown by the adopted country at Fonseka at any time, it would be construed that Rajapaksa was responsible for the stone giving justification for the incriminating statement to be publicized and Rajapaksa running against a wave of public emotion; a classic case of three birds with one stone.
US moves in the Sri Lankan election
US manoeuvres in the Sri Lankan election is to effect a change in Sri Lanka’s geopolitical position. This calls for a regime change and the ouster of Rajapaksa.
To this end they have instructed the non charismatic politicians to keep out of the fray; they have successfully divided a country which eight months ago was united; they have been able to weaken the Rajapaksa team by corrupting one of the team with a permanent residency; they have been successful in fielding against Rajapaksa, Fonseka, a candidate who has a trifle more appeal than the old political war horses of the Opposition.
The battle is how to present a coarse, humourless General as an erudite individual of some refinement and polish and to dent Rajapaksa’s unbelievable popularity in the country.
To this end, as carried by the Asian Tribune, a massive USD 140 Million has been pumped into the country through conduits that include NGOs which the Kerry report has identified as being friendly to US interests.
US expectations from Fonseka
Mavil Aru in Sampur was the beginning of the end for the terrorists. There has been much bafflement at reports that the previous status quo in Sampur, located on the Southern rim of the Trincomalee harbour and considered ground vital for the control of the harbour, is being restored.
There are indications that the essence of the Wickremesinghe CFA agreement of 2002, which concede control of the North and the East and nearly two thirds of the coastline of the island to the terrorists, is being reintroduced; the CFA enabled the terrorists to build up their illegal state infrastructure which resulted in thousands of soldiers having to lay down their lives simply to dismantle it.
Also there are indications that Kumaratunge’s infamous and ill fated Post Tsunami Operations Management (PTOM) of 2005 which gave equal status to the terrorists and the government of Sri Lanka in the management of Tsunami related funds, and created that insidious mechanism-referred to as ‘Co-Chairs’ (EU, Norway, US, and Japan) which eroded our sovereignty and legalized these countries to interfere at will with the internal affairs of Sri Lanka, is being surreptitiously brought back.
On the last occasion the JVP with Rajapaksa fought against it and had it thrown out at the Supreme Court.
This time however the JVP, heavily dependent on Japan for their funds, appear to be consenting partners.
Rumour Street has it that the US has instructed Fonseka to deny the Indians the Uranium rich soil stretching along the coastline of Mullaitivu and to give access to the US to mine this monazite for a pittance.
The news on the grapevine is also that Fonseka on the dictates of the US has agreed to allow the Norwegians access to the recently staked area, abounding with mineral resources, on the sloping continental shelf off the coast of Sri Lanka.
Considering the strong link between Blake and the Diaspora, it is not surprising that the political arm of the terrorists is supporting Fonseka who time and time again has insisted that Sri Lanka belongs to the Sinhalese and who insisted that the Tamil persons in the IDP Welfare Centres should be detained indefinitely as there were 20,000 terrorists hiding among 280,000 civilians.
Executive Presidency
The Kerry report has identified the Executive Presidency as one of Sri Lanka’s strengths which enabled it to overcome the terrorists and which Rajapaksa refuses to dismantle. At the moment the three eggs of Executive, Legislature and Judiciary are in three baskets. The dropping of one basket will not crack the other two eggs. To weaken the Sri Lanka State that it may never in the future do the unthinkable of defeating an invincible terrorist group, the US through the NGOs are attempting to put the two eggs of Executive and Legislature in one basket so that when the legislative egg breaks, the executive egg will automatically break.
The battle lines are drawn for January 26 the battle is not between Rajapaksa and Fonseka but between Sri Lanka and the US. On May 18, 2009 Sri Lanka won an historic proxy war on the banks of the Nanthikadal lagoon defeating the scourge of terrorism and the threat of neo colonialism. On the 26th, the battle is even more crucial; Sri Lankans have to defeat the neo colonialist if they are to protect their victory at Nanthikadal.
The sovereignty of Sri Lanka is being challenged and is at stake; the battle is even more difficult than on May 18, with the US throwing in 140 Million US dollars, buying up one of the key players of May 18 and having the historical comprador class doing, as usual, their dirty work. Sri Lankans rise in your numbers and defend your country. This is the time the country needs you. Stand up and be counted.
Concluded
Original article reference:
- A part analysis of John Kerry Report on Sri Lanka - Part 2 by Sarojini Dutt
EVIL USA
Survival Guide Under Capitalism
Archive
-
►
2011
(28)
-
►
April
(6)
- The truth behind UN report on Sri Lanka - The mupp...
- Vote for Sri Lankan president Mahinda Rajapaksa at...
- Smart man’s Avurudu Vs. extended April fool’s day
- Germany VS India - Applicable to Sri Lanka as well...
- 300 Years of FOSSIL FUELS in 300 Seconds
- Sri Lankan cricket in World cup 2011 - A realisti...
-
►
April
(6)
-
▼
2010
(95)
-
►
December
(8)
- Capitalism 1 - How monetery system work
- Mind blowing facts about USA
- WikiRebels - The Documentary
- WIKILEAKS CABLEGATE - ROCK, RAPS & REGGAE
- Anonymous presents Operation PaperStorm (on 18 Dec...
- The WikiLeaks triggered Information War – Part 1
- WikiLeaks – The insight story
- President Mahinda Rajapaksa is taken for a ride by...
-
▼
January
(22)
- Village for Mahinda, Town for Sarath – The inside ...
- A part analysis of John Kerry Report on Sri Lanka ...
- A part analysis of John Kerry Report on Sri Lanka ...
- Vote for Sarath Fonseka to revenge Mahinda Rajapak...
- Presidential Election – The test of personality of...
- JVP – Evolution from Marxism to opportunism - Part...
- Boss Vs Leader
- When facts are at play, myths shy away!
- The West has a deal to settle in presidential elec...
- How to vote in Presidential election 2010 in Sri L...
- A tear drop of capitalism - The tragedy of employe...
- The Opertaion Counter SF - Mission accomplished : ...
- The tale of two headed beast
- Liar, Liar.. Pants on fire…
- From SMS President to Facebook President
- Beware - the suicidal mission of TNA
- An ACID test to select the good ruler - The Dasa ...
- Similarities Between Chandrika and Fonseka
- Love your work, but not the company
- Why do capitalist vaddhas' challenging the generos...
- Reveal – The dirty tactic behind LankaEnews becomi...
- Prepare for the knowledge based rising –sharpen yo...
-
►
December
(8)
Popular feature posts
- Mind your (own) English accent - The facts and myths - Part 1
- The Majority Vs Minority
- Guerilla Marketing: Mirror of Sri Lankan politics
- USA - The living hell of the world
- The rise and fall of Royal-Thomian-Bridget era
- Manipulation of media in the marketing society
- Vinitha Vs Nimmi
- The Law: Roman-Dutch mismatch in Sinhala Buddhist society
- Astrology: The mental tail of Sri Lankan society
- Buddhist economics theory – A practical approach
Popular politics posts
A part analysis of John Kerry Report on Sri Lanka - Part 2
29 Jan 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

0 comments:
Post a Comment